User Tools

Site Tools


open_peer-review

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

open_peer-review [09-Oct-11 18:55]
sanjay
open_peer-review [09-Oct-11 21:55] (current)
sanjay
Line 2: Line 2:
 [[http://​www.darkmatter101.org/​site/​|darkmatter Journal]] shifted to accepting submissions subject to external peer review in 2011.((Our practice up until then was of in-house editorial review.)) While we remain committed to publishing '​non-peer review'​ work (e.g. Commons and Reviews etc.), the decision to adopt external peer review has been extensively discussed amongst the editorial team.  [[http://​www.darkmatter101.org/​site/​|darkmatter Journal]] shifted to accepting submissions subject to external peer review in 2011.((Our practice up until then was of in-house editorial review.)) While we remain committed to publishing '​non-peer review'​ work (e.g. Commons and Reviews etc.), the decision to adopt external peer review has been extensively discussed amongst the editorial team. 
  
-However, the journal aims to eschew traditional (closed) peer-review practices, because essentially they are flawed for failing to promote academic discussion and transparency of knowledge production.((For an excellent critique and discussion of alternative practices of '​open'​ peer review see [[http://​hackthestate.org/​2009/​07/27/​open-process-academic-publishing/​|Open-process academic publishing]] by Toni Prug. For an example, see the peer review process of [[http://​cspp.oekonux.org/​about/​peer-review|Critical Studies in Peer Production]] journal))+However, the journal aims to eschew traditional (closed) peer-review practices, because essentially they are flawed for failing to promote academic discussion and transparency of knowledge production.((For an excellent critique and discussion of alternative practices of '​open'​ peer review see [[http://​hackthestate.org/​2009/​12/16/​open-process-academic-publishing-v1-2/​|Open-process academic publishing]] by Toni Prug. For an example, see the peer review process of [[http://​cspp.oekonux.org/​about/​peer-review|Critical Studies in Peer Production]] journal))
  
 Our (semi-)open peer review practices involves the following:​((We believe peer review is a dynamic process, and reserve the right to develop our open practices over time.)) ​ Our (semi-)open peer review practices involves the following:​((We believe peer review is a dynamic process, and reserve the right to develop our open practices over time.)) ​
open_peer-review.1318182947.txt.gz · Last modified: 09-Oct-11 18:55 by sanjay